decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
And why agree to Monsanto's terms? | 168 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
And why agree to Monsanto's terms?
Authored by: 351-4V on Wednesday, February 20 2013 @ 10:44 PM EST
Warning: Many years ago I worked for Asgrow, when they were owned by Upjohn, before the Monsanto purchase. I did not work in research or with soybeans, I detassled corn, a lowly job at best. I now own farmland but I am not a farmer. Another person (my younger brother) pays me rent to use my land and he makes these types of decisions, not I. But I think he would answer the question as follows:

In short, for economic reasons. Using the previous seasons crop (bin-run) for seed has only 2 advantages, convenience and price, but a big drawback in terms of yield. Using Roundup Ready (RR) seed will increase the yield just enough to cover the increased cost of using that patented seed.

Trust me, Monsanto has researched this thoroughly and found the exact price point at which farmers will pay for the patented seed as opposed to using bin-run or another competing commercial product. Monsanto execs are not dummies, they've done their market research. The farmers have done their research as well. They've planted all kinds of seeds in similar circumstances and painstakingly recorded the growing results in order to allow other farmers to evaluate the efficacy of one seed type over another.

As far as "supporting the evil Monopolist" goes, it's not really a consideration. Sure, one must agree to the Monsanto contract but it's perceived as just another TOS contract like all the other TOS contracts we "agree" to these days. Little more than the common shrink-wrap license we are all used to ignoring. Most farmers willingly enter into the agreement, they have no intention of using the patented seed in any way contradictory to the agreement.

I think it is also useful to know that both Asgrow and Monsanto have long histories of being friendly to the farming community. Monsanto used to have local stores operated by local residents, which earned them all kinds of goodwill in the community. Over the years, Asgrow has dumped huge amounts of money into research which has produced drought-resistant strains and shorter-season strains of soybeans that will grow in conditions previously unthinkable.

It is only rather recently that Monsanto and hence Asgrow, due to the purchase, has morphed from Lt. Commander Data into Evil Brother Lor. But make no mistake, Evil Brother Lor they are today, not to be trusted under any circumstances.

over time, there has to be an economic effect, deleterious to you, the farmer...
Oh there is. But it is ill-defined and vague. And after all it is "over time". That deleterious effect is very difficult to quantify in terms of today's dollars and thus not very amenable to being used as a basis for objective management decisions that are unassailable from stockholders wishing to maximize their investments or landlords seeking to maximize their rental income.

Besides, the patent runs out soon which means even bin-run seed will be RR and unencumbered by patents in a few years anyway. So why fight it?

And that's what you are going to hear from the farmers that actually use this seed.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )