decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Denmark - Lisbon Treaty Unconstitutional? | 45 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Canada - You Have the Right to Google a Lawyer
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 19 2013 @ 06:31 PM EST
Hollywood crime dramas are infamous for the scene when an accused is taken to a local police station and permitted a single phone call to contact a relative or lawyer. While the story-line is myth -- there is no limit on the number of phone calls available to an accused or detainee -- a recent Alberta case established a new, real requirement for law enforcement.

After a 19-year old struggled to find a lawyer using the telephone, the court ruled that police must provide an accused with Internet access in order to exercise their right to counsel.

Michael Geist, The Tyee

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Denmark - Lisbon Treaty Unconstitutional?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 20 2013 @ 01:58 AM EST
The Danish Supreme Court (Højesteret) is to rule on the constitutionality of
politicians signing the Lisbon Treaty without a plebiscite on Feb 20.

In 2008, a group of citizens challenged the Danish government in court, claiming
the Lisbon Treaty requires Denmark to hand over partial self-determination to
the EU, which the Danish constitution (Grundloven) prohibits.

If the court agrees, Denmark (and the EU) could face a constitutional crisis.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Cloud - The New Lock-In
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 20 2013 @ 02:44 AM EST

The story isn't too interesting in itself. It's mainly about a Heroku (a cloud "platform" vendor popular with Ruby on Rails developers) customer complaining about his chosen vendor platform not scaling as well as he thought it should, and about the expensive performance analytics software not being worth the money he was paying for it and so demanding refunds. What did catch my interest was the following:

To which the first group would respond: “Sure we got something, but Heroku also TOOK from us without asking. We spent a bunch of time optimizing performance in the wrong places and people using our site got a worse experience than we understood, which caused us to lose users. Finally, Heroku has us locked in: because we've grown in traffic and application complexity, moving to another host is much more difficult now than it would have been 2 years ago

to give a bit of background, a web 2.0 company called "Rap Genius" (and no I've never heard of them either, and have no idea what they do) wrote their web site using "Ruby on Rails", which was all the rage a couple of years ago. Heroku started as a value added hosting provider which catered to the "I write Ruby on Rails sites on my Macbook while sitting in Starbucks" crowd. Ruby on Rails itself isn't tied to Heroku, but it's possible to write all sorts of assumptions into your application which depend on Heroku features.

Now roll forward a couple of years, and "Rap Genius" find out that Heroku's "intelligent traffic routing" doesn't really scale up to large volumes of web traffic. Furthermore, Heroku is now saying "Ruby on Rails man? Are you still using that grandpa? Everybody is doing async with NodeJS now. Get with the times!" I can't see this ending well.

The moral that I take from this story is that today's "cloud" is like yesterday's "operating system". If you aren't careful, you will lock yourself into a single vendor and depend on them to deliver the results for you. An open cloud platform gives you vendor independence so you can move to a different hosting provider if the current one doesn't deliver. It's something to keep in mind when making your future plans.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )