decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Judge Robart Reopens MS v. Motorola Nov. Trial for New Evidence From Motorola ~pj | 28 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Judge Robart Reopens MS v. Motorola Nov. Trial for New Evidence From Motorola ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, February 17 2013 @ 04:01 AM EST
Thanks for responding PJ.

I added the wifi ordeal in the middle of my thoughts and didn't mean to
imply that FRAND patents were dropped. The Wifi Moto patents seemed to
be dropped bc Google's deal with the US Gov.

The H.264 interlaced video patents issue is still ongoing.

FRAND issues are still going to be decided.

If someone is opposed to software patents and 0 royalties for SEPs, how
can a person support either side?

I'd prefer that they BOTH lose.

Moto's legal arguments in the wifi part (now withdrawn) gave patent trolls a
big stick to beat down Mom and Pop. The fact that trolls/NPEs can now use
the same arguement that Moto paid ($millions to lawyers) for, to sue Mom
and Pop.

I like this website and intelligent discourse and you personally responding.

I'm not a troll... I like discussing these things that are so important to our
society.

Still no one addresses the 2.25% of final sale price issue here except to
say it is the initial or opening offer. Legally vague but maybe legal. What
about the consequences on the rest of the industry? No one here is looking
at the potential negative effects on the entire tech industry.

PJ - you support no software patents and 0% royalties on SEPs.. Would
you support one without the other? (Sorry if I misquote you)

Good discussion. :)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )