decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Facebook sued over "Like" button | 183 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
hacks.mozilla.org — Defending Opus
Authored by: JimDiGriz on Monday, February 11 2013 @ 04:47 AM EST
On January 18th, France Telecom filed an IPR disclosure against Opus citing a single patent under non-royalty free terms. This raises a key question – what impact does this have on Opus? A close evaluation indicates that it has no impact on the Opus specification in any way.

Summary:

A careful reading of the FT patent reveals that:

  1. The FT patent does not cover the Opus reference implementation because critical limitations of the claim are absent;
  2. The patent is directed to encoders, therefore it cannot affect the Opus specification, which only includes conformance tests for the decoder, and
  3. With a simple change, we can make non-infringement even more obvious.

Let’s expand on those points a bit. If you don’t want to hear about patent claims, you should stop reading this article now.

(But if you do) Defending Opus

JdG

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Facebook sued over "Like" button
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, February 11 2013 @ 07:58 AM EST
"Breaking news" from the BBC
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21411622

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

EU Data Protection:
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, February 11 2013 @ 03:20 PM EST
Proposed Amendments Written by US Lobbyists

Without getting pedantic, the quoted textual changes appeared to me to be, EU objective, US subjective. That must say something to the relative trans-Atlantic attitudes to governance. Europe has had a few hundred years more experience, and more recent experience, of being governed by tyrants. The US has never yet enjoyed that, so their laws are sliding into the trap where it will be possible. Tyranny starts small, then one day it's too late.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

    bill gates and the failure of reddit
    Authored by: designerfx on Monday, February 11 2013 @ 04:56 PM EST
    beyond that I consider reddit to be a relative abomination
    of the internet when it comes to communities, I'm humored
    that Bill Gates' AMA was so short that it wasn't even on
    Reddit's calendar. Beyond that he picked really easy
    questions to answer, of course.
    https://www.google.com/calendar/embed?
    src=amaverify%40gmail.com

    What a waste. Gotta love how philanthropic people think he
    is as he gives away windows software to establish lock-in in
    other countries.

    [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

    Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
    Comments are owned by the individual posters.

    PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )