decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Total malarkey | 267 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Total malarkey
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Tuesday, February 12 2013 @ 01:18 AM EST
An example: The ratio of the circumference to diameter of a circle, it just exists. Does not matter where you are, or who you are. It does not even matter that anyone even exists that can appreciate that that ratio is a transcendental number. It just flat out exists. It is a law of nature. As to the logic side, well, that should be obvious to many of us here, but for those that are not familiar with boolean logic, you will find the basis of all computer software today.

Note the tie between logic and math:
Here, x and y can only have the values zero or one, i.e., TRUE or FALSE.

In summary the three basic Boolean operations can be defined arithmetically as follows.

x∧y = xy
x∨y = x + y − xy
¬x = 1 − x

Those read as follows:
x AND y is the same as multiplying x and y.
x OR y is the same as adding the two and subtracting the product.
NOT x is the same as subtracting x from 1.

Everything in computing is built upon the above.

But not one invented the reality behind math and logic.

This is not to say that there have not been great discoveries,
and great development of descriptive systems,
i.e., written notation systems (ex: algebra and calculus),
but the underlying reality is that

NO ONE invented math and logic.

They just exist, ready to be learned and understood.

Ready to be applied.

Computer software is just *applied* math and logic.

It is absolutely in no way deserving of a patent.

---

You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )