decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
I have to wonder.... | 267 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I have to wonder....
Authored by: ThrPilgrim on Saturday, February 09 2013 @ 05:25 AM EST
- Non-deterministic machines (e.g. some kinds of quantum algorithms)

The non-determinism is simply input to the algorithm. The algorithm it's self
does not change.

- Anything where the run-time of the algorithm is integral to
its performance (e.g. industrial control).

In that case you may be able to patent the industrial controller, but the
software is still entirly maths.

---
Beware of him who would deny you access to information for in his heart he
considers himself your master.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Quantum machines still have both a hardware and software component
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, February 09 2013 @ 10:07 AM EST

The hardware is patentable - it's physical.

The software is not patentable - it's abstract.

If one wants to argue:

    But if I built a strictly hardware machine that can do X, I could patent that
Fine... then build such a device and patent it. The problem you'll face is that you'll be held to what patent law is supposed to protect: a single implementation!

Someone could build something different - calculating the same computation - and not infringe because they have a different implementation!

Patenting the abstract = patenting the idea.

This breaks the patent exchange because you're supposed to disseminate the idea to the public for immediate consumption while patenting a specific implementation of the idea!

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )