decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Classic misdirection | 267 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Classic misdirection
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, February 09 2013 @ 12:55 PM EST
"Legal protection"... errrr... that's what a copyright is.

"contributes to the economy"... there's the basic problem in a
nutshell... nothing to do with innovation or invention, simply that it puts $$$
in someone's pocket*. Any activity that involves an exchange of data/goods
contibutes to the economy. This has been true for ages. But now, doing it on a
computer suddenly makes a new invention.

The first step in reforming the patent system is to get the economy out of the
equation and go back to encouraging invention and the dissemination of
knowledge.

*And the contibute to the economy argument is a complete fail anyway, since when
you look at the beeelion$ tied up in litigation, it becomes apparent that it
isn't a "contribution", its a redistribution resulting in a net loss.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )