|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 08 2013 @ 02:57 AM EST |
I agree all the way.
Here's the thing, journalists rush to put the first story on the Internet
(sometimes, not always, failing to do the proper research) to get the
breaking story and the most clicks to to increase the money they can
charge for ads.
The irony ( or maybe contradiction is a better word here ) is that Google is
going to look like the loser here bc of poorly researched articles written to
increase in crease clicks and ad rates.
At the same time Google makes 97-98% of their money from online ads.
I'm having a hard time explaining my thoughts, maybe neither a irony or
contradiction are the right words, maybe something like "weird" which
is
vague is better.
Summary = TLDR
The largest Internet ad company that makes 97-98% of their revenue from
selling online ads MAY be misrepresented as a loser in a non final lawsuit
by online newspapers, blogs and whatnot because those writers need to be
first to release the news, sometimes without proper research, in order to
get more clicks so that these websites can charge more per ad..
I hope that makes sense but that's the world we live in.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 08 2013 @ 11:46 AM EST |
If you invalidate all the claims, you invalidate the patent.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
