|
| Authored by: arnt on Sunday, February 03 2013 @ 06:48 PM EST |
..I somehow doubt IBM will let the Delaware court allow TSG
destroying the evidence in the Utah case now, such stupidity
would destroy their reputation on ethics and integrity that
they have spent billions in these cases to defend, on top of
what that IBM action has done for us in the GNU/Linux world.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Guil Rarey on Sunday, February 03 2013 @ 06:49 PM EST |
Plus, IBM's Lanham Act counterclaims can potentially pierce the corporate veil
and can maybe (IANAL) survive the Chapter 7 winding up of SCO, so their need for
the records does not end with the demise of SCO.
---
If the only way you can value something is with money, you have no idea what
it's worth. If you try to make money by making money, you won't. You might con
so[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: DannyB on Monday, February 04 2013 @ 11:14 AM EST |
Can IBM volunteer to pay to store the documents and business records . . .
. . . inside of the Watson supercomputer?
---
The price of freedom is eternal litigation.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, February 04 2013 @ 12:00 PM EST |
I honestly don't think anyone will object to this. TSG is a dead rotting corpse
of a company at this point, and is not a threat to anyone. If there is no
threat, and nothing to be gained by bludgeoning the corpse, nobody is going to
bother. Maybe it's pessimistic of me, but I don't see criminal court action
being taken against TSG. Everyone with a vested interest in this has already
gone home. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
