decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
I smell a patent application... | 223 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I smell a patent application...
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 05 2013 @ 02:47 PM EST

Sounds more like snake oil, than a patent application.

Given the description, I suspect that the prior art can be found in the PGP + Telix + the Telix extension that deleted email every hour combination.(?I think that hourly was the default setting. It was user configurable.) This was circa 1990.

I have a recollection of a procmail recipe that did something similar. That would have been circa 1997.

Granted, both of those delete content on one side only. At least one beta tester stated that had the tech been available in 2006, they would have avoided an unpleasant experience at the hands of a government agency. The tech was available but did require some user sophistication to set up.

There is a Thunderbird extension that deletes email on both the sender's and recipient's side, if both users have installed the extension.

The big issue is whether or no people will use these privacy enhancing tools.

My bank, for example, is pathologically committed to http, in the grounds that https is "insecure", and "unreliable" (Seriously, that is what IT told me.) They are equally unable to send encrypted email.

Likewise, despite HIPPA requiring secure transmission of data, none of my doctors, nor any of the hospitals, government agencies, doctors, psychologists, surgeons, and advocates are able to send anything encrypted.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • That's why - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 05 2013 @ 05:09 PM EST
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )