decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Apple MacPro withdrawn in EU over safety issues | 129 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The dumbing down continues
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, February 02 2013 @ 03:01 PM EST
1. IEC Regulation with the force of law, essential amendment, $188.
2. The article refers throughout to the "professional" model,
ie. the users are s'posed to know what they are doing. Well no,
even in New Zealand we distinguish professional users by requiring
that access to naughty bits should require the use of hand tools.
MacPro's easy click latches don't cut it.

Add to that the fact that fan guards reduce airflow, and increase noise,
possibly dropping a notch on the EU's fanatical Energy Efficiency scale.
I can't find yet what the story is with power socket shielding.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apple MacPro withdrawn in EU over safety issues
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, February 04 2013 @ 12:35 PM EST
I am not a regulatory consultant and my experience is medical devices but it is
not a legal requirment to comply with a harmonised standard like IEC EN 60950.
It IS a legal requirment to comply with the appropriate directives such as the
low voltage directive and compliance with the relevant harmonised standards
gives a presumption of compliance with the directive.

If Apple felt strongly the new requirments, whatever they are, do not make sense
they are free not to meet them but must then be prepared to justify that despite
this they in fact the do meet the directives, in this case essentially that they
are safe.

We do this on medical devices where the standard writers had not anticipated the
characteristics of genuinely new devices so the harmonised standard for these
specific devices genuinely does not make sense. This is quite different than
simply not wanting to meet a requirment because it is awkward or inconvenient.

In apples case it is difficult to think of anything more standard and generic
than the MacPRO so if they do not comply it is probably because there is some
genuine issue. A product with the ability to stick a finger in a spinning fan
(mentioned in the report), if true, seems a quite obvious safety problem. It
will cause an injury, albeit one that is normally minor, but with possible
secondary problem caused by blood in the vicinity of electrical equipment plus
infection etc. In small childeren it could cause more significant problems,
perhaps even loss of a finger.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Possibly fatal? - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, February 04 2013 @ 05:37 PM EST
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )