decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Which is why | 123 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Don't hold your breath, guys
Authored by: Tolerance on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 03:07 PM EST
I think it was the TIME/LIFE science library which issued a
book ("Machines") in 1964 - nearly fifty years ago - which
observed that originally the patent office did in fact demand
a working model, but that by the end of the nineteenth
century that requirement was abandoned ...

Jefferson was probably rotating in his grave at that point.
By 1964 I imagine you could have got useful power linking up
a dynamo. By now ...

---
Grumpy old man

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Which is why
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, February 02 2013 @ 09:57 AM EST
I'm extremely happy for a patent holder to have to store the working model, but
what is to stop the model holder from modifying the model so that it conforms to
modern thinking (ie incorporates other ideas) or to the thing being sued over
(though this would rather hamper any further usage of a vague patent as like a
quantum particle, now that it has been read, it has finally settled into a
state).

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Which is why - Authored by: Wol on Saturday, February 02 2013 @ 02:57 PM EST
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )