|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonomous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 04:22 AM EST |
Wang-Lo humbly requests that you create the Title of each post in the form of
error --> correction.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonomous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 04:23 AM EST |
Wang-Lo humbly cautions you not to waste everyone's valuable time by straying on
topic.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- The countdown to 100,000 Windows 8 apps falls short - Authored by: JamesK on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 08:06 AM EST
- To Wang Lo - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 08:16 AM EST
- Shriek! Automatic amber-alert texts startle cellphone users in U.S. - Authored by: JamesK on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 08:20 AM EST
- Samsung gains tablet market share as Apple lead narrows - Authored by: tiger99 on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 09:22 AM EST
- Why banks are likely to face more software glitches in 2013 - Authored by: tiger99 on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 09:33 AM EST
- April Casburn jailed for News of the World leak offer - Authored by: tiger99 on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 09:36 AM EST
- After patenting the rectangle, Apple now trademarks the store - Authored by: RichardR on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 11:10 AM EST
- Oracle Tries Again (Java) - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 06:22 PM EST
- Google settles French media dispute - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 08:10 PM EST
- Infected salmon declared fit for human consumption by Canada - U.S. won’t allow tainted imports - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 10:04 PM EST
- Off Topic Thread - Authored by: bmw on Saturday, February 02 2013 @ 03:53 AM EST
- Off Topic Thread - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, February 02 2013 @ 09:52 AM EST
| |
| Authored by: Anonomous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 04:24 AM EST |
Wang-Lo humbly reminds you to include a link to the Newspick that is the
inspiration for your comment.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonomous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 04:25 AM EST |
Wang-Lo hastens to express humble gratitude toward those engaging in this
valuable work.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 05:48 AM EST |
A flat "denied" suggests that the appeals court is not wasting too
much time with Apple's nonsense.
I don't think Apple will find the next venue nearly as accommodating as Koh's
court.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: maroberts on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 08:20 AM EST |
So what odds is everyone giving on
a) reducing the level of damages owed by Samsung to Apple on appeal
b) getting a complete retrial on one or more grounds?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Odds - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 08:38 AM EST
- Odds - 100% on both - Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Saturday, February 02 2013 @ 12:33 AM EST
- Odds - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, February 04 2013 @ 01:32 PM EST
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 08:31 AM EST |
People have been going Nuclear with a wide range of patents. Monsanto
and seeds for example,
Any legislation meant to rein in this type of behavior would have to consider
the system as a whole, not just software. Part of the problem comes down
to producing a definition of software besides I know it when I see it. Part of
the problem is that software is embedded in so many devices, and how do
you separate the two?
Last but not least, there are other types of endeavor which are suffering
too. By fixating on software, we deny them succor.
Wayne
http://madhatter.ca
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 08:36 AM EST |
Hey, apple are honest that the damages are unrecoverable, because now people
know there are better alternatives than apple. Without other players in the
market, apple's sells are granted. Now apple wants to go back to that time. Why
do you deny them this *right*?! After all they were first to claim the market is
theirs, it is too late for others now they have a patent over a device with
corners, just don't get in their way, understood?
On a more serious note, I am wondering why do they think the samsung devices
have rounded corners, in another pov they just don't have corners :)[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- apple honest - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 08:41 AM EST
- Corner patent! - Authored by: Tinstaafl on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 08:51 AM EST
- apple honest - Authored by: DannyB on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 10:56 AM EST
- apple honest - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 11:18 AM EST
- apple honest - Authored by: DannyB on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 11:27 AM EST
- apple honest - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 12:48 PM EST
- apple honest - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 01:05 PM EST
- apple honest - Authored by: red floyd on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 06:23 PM EST
- apple honest - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 11:56 AM EST
- apple honest - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, February 02 2013 @ 03:04 AM EST
- apple honest - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 12:00 PM EST
- How to end this sillyness - Authored by: ailuromancy on Saturday, February 02 2013 @ 12:34 AM EST
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 05 2013 @ 09:15 AM EST |
Apple has the money to litigate.
You win some, you lose some as lawsuits go. And the only way to determine
the validity of a patent is to sue to protect your rights to it.
Apple already has cross license agreements that protect its designs with:
HTC, Microsoft, Nokia.
Apple has exposed Google as evil. Google's attempt to sue Apple and others
over FRAND patents and renege on its grand-back license for MP4 video is
like SCO breaking the GPL - Groklaw's favorite license.
And with all this litigation, the outcome that will be interesting is if Samsung
FORKS Android so it has its own version like Amazon has its own version. It
would still run Android apps. But it would be free of evil Google's teats.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
