decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
swmcd said "rhetorical question" not "rhetoric" | 202 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
swmcd said "rhetorical question" not "rhetoric"
Authored by: bugstomper on Thursday, January 31 2013 @ 05:20 PM EST
"A rhetorical question is a figure of speech in the form of a question that is asked in order to make a point and without the expectation of a reply." (from Rhetorical question [Wikipedia], taken from rhetorical questions [rhetoric.byu.edu])

swmcd is criticizing the use of a rhetorical question as being too informal, not criticizing it for coming across as insincere rhetoric. "Rhetoric" and "rhetorical question" have the same word root but very different connotations.

Since I referred to Silva Rhetoricae: The Forest of Rhetoric" [rhetoric.byu.edu] which is a wonderful website on rhetoric in the formal sense, I have to point out that there is another use for the word "rhetoric". Saying that one is engaging in rhetoric or resorting to rhetoric is using it with the negative connotation in the definition you quoted "but often regarded as lacking in sincerity". But as it is used on that web site:

Rhetoric is the study of effective speaking and writing. And the art of persuasion. And many other things.

In its long and vigorous history rhetoric has enjoyed many definitions, accommodated differing purposes, and varied widely in what it included. And yet, for most of its history it has maintained its fundamental character as a discipline for training students 1) to perceive how language is at work orally and in writing, and 2) to become proficient in applying the resources of language in their own speaking and writing"

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )