decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Seems to me: you're just telling me what I said | 144 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Seems to me: you're just telling me what I said
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, January 29 2013 @ 05:03 PM EST

You say:

So you cannot bring in ease of cracking it compared to 10 years ago as one of your arguments whatever side you are arguing for.
And I said:
Even assuming the worst case scenario - a brute force usage as you describe - can't be relied on to be limitations for too long.
Combined with:
I think we're doing both Society and ourselves a great disservice if we focus on the technological limitations instead of speaking to the heart of the situation. We're not helping find a better resolution quicker. We're bogging it down with technical details which - in my humble opinion - don't affect the fact that a privacy breach has been comitted. Whether that privacy breach was done via a computer or walking through an unlocked door and accessing an unlocked filing cabinet doesn't alter the fact the it was still a breach of privacy.
So yup: I full agree with what you've presented! It's what I said too :)

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )