|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 01:21 AM EST |
But it wasn't a real offer, it was way out of anything "Reasonable"
but
obviously you disagree
Logic is not your forte[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 01:47 AM EST |
Reason, that still evades you?
Please do a point by point response instead of something so ineffectual.
Explain why Moto should get $2.25 million per $100 million airplane? Your
comments don't support anything.
Is there anyone with reasonable conversation here?
Apple Fandooys and Google Fans, please refrained from real convert
conversations. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: ukjaybrat on Friday, February 01 2013 @ 09:12 AM EST |
I wonder if these guys go to a pawn shop and start the bidding
war at exactly what they think their item is worth... i wonder
how far that is going to get them?
---
IANAL[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 06 2013 @ 01:24 AM EST |
Some of the legal stuff being debated is if a company needs to counter
offer, an offer they think is unreasonable. If the judge rules in MS favor then
there could be a jury trial examining if the Moto offer is truely reasonable..
A jury that heard the above Boeing argument, might easily think Moto's
demands are unreasonable.
The problem I have is that Moto's (Google's) stance hurts OSS in the long
run. Google/Moto can hurt OSS in the big picture.
Why don't people here get that?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- -yawn- - Authored by: myNym on Wednesday, February 06 2013 @ 04:28 AM EST
|
