decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Why? You have to look behind the curtain... | 86 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Why? You have to look behind the curtain...
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, January 27 2013 @ 09:42 AM EST
Why not fired? You have to look behind the curtain and
understand that a certain company with all it's money, has
it invested all over the place. Maybe holding board spots
by proxy, in who knows what companies?

You know about the influence in the ISO standards process!
I don't need to say more... support from the folks that
could be by proxy "stacked" on the various technical groups.

You don't think that Elop going to Nokia wasn't pre-
arranged? Could it have been the play all along, and the
game plan still hasn't changed?

That is a good question to ask. It's a long haul strategy,
and whoever has the votes in the board rooms wins.

Yep. That simple. Shareholders are often disorganized
enough to miss the real action that is going on with the big
money investors and who pulls their strings, and via
proxies, tickles their wallets.

We know how many "tech financial writers" are pulling for a
certain company for so long..., and against their
competition. And, you don't think that a company will bet
all it's options or eggs to one basket do you?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Just incompetent
Authored by: Charles888 on Sunday, January 27 2013 @ 09:43 AM EST
One might think he's deliberately trashing the company.
I don't think it is anything so nefarious. He was just deluded. Also, a useless board.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )