Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

*Parties do not file motions hoping to have them denied.* | 128 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

*Parties do not file motions hoping to have them denied.*

Authored by: webster on Friday, January 25 2013 @ 02:42 PM EST

.

Maybe so, but parties file things all the time that they expect to be denied.
Arguments made in one motion may be a way of educating and arguing for another
motion or goal.

E.G. the instant motion for discovery encompassed arguments by Samsung as to how
the patents in question were not only invalid, obvious, but they were
technically improper having been published prior to the application. This will
float in one of the judge's cranial vacuums only to be wafted over by other
Samsung motions and arguments on another day invoking its righteousness and
sympathy. After all, the judge can't deny everything; he has to be fair; and
they are counting.

.

.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

*Parties do not file motions hoping to have them denied.* - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, January 25 2013 @ 02:57 PM EST
- *Parties do not file motions hoping to have them denied.* - Authored by: bugstomper on Saturday, January 26 2013 @ 03:35 PM EST
  - *Parties do not file motions hoping to have them denied.* - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, January 28 2013 @ 10:09 AM EST

More, Grewell Please, ... maybe later!

Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, January 26 2013 @ 11:33 AM EST

Filing done, and it's a paint by numbers game.
Legal field numbers are what they are.
Maybe, to make sure it's all there for an appeal?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )