decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
They would have to increase patent application fees... | 661 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
They would have to increase patent application fees...
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, March 30 2013 @ 11:28 AM EDT
How about charging applicants who DONT get their patent approved by the PTO
double the amount they would have to pay then had their application been
approved.

HUGE incentive to get your prior art search right, and avoid overbroad claims.
Just wall of the area you really need to get your research and development costs
back, nothing more. As the patent system initially was designed for.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

They would have to increase patent application fees...
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 02 2013 @ 03:01 AM EDT

($4M is a median unfortunately, couldn't find a mean quoted.)
Why is it unfortunate that only a median is given and no mean?

As a median it is telling you that half the settlements were for $4m or less, and half were for $4M or more.

With one or two extremely high settlements, the mean average would be skewed.

Perhaps a more useful average than mean (in addition to median) would be the mode - the value of settlement that occurs most often.

If you insist on the mean, then some measure of spread is vital (at least the range, but the standard deviation might also be useful); I would suspect that the distribution of settlements is not Normal, but something like a Poisson, with a peak towards the lower settlement values.

By the way, official stats from a census use medians.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )