|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, March 28 2013 @ 05:13 PM EDT |
Evidence of that kind of professional qualification would seem to be lacking in
many cases.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Evidence? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, March 28 2013 @ 05:44 PM EDT
- Evidence? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, March 28 2013 @ 07:03 PM EDT
- Evidence? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, March 28 2013 @ 07:05 PM EDT
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, March 28 2013 @ 05:14 PM EDT |
If that is the case, the patent attorney that files a patent
application that later becomes invalidated should be disciplined severly for
neglegence because he/she should
have known that it would not be valid. That two sided
sword seems to only have one edge in patent law and the
patent attorneys seem to be the ones wearing the blindfold
as they weigh their gold on the scales of justice.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 29 2013 @ 10:29 AM EDT |
The regulations require either 1) an bachelor's degree in
certain majors OR
2) A certain number of semester-hours in certain
(combinations of) subjects (generally less than required for
a major - comparable to a pre-med program for example) OR
3) a graduate degree in certain subjects OR
4) practical experience plus passing an engineering exam OR
5) being a member of certain foreign patent bars (Canada).
I have no idea what the canadian requirements are..
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- A caveat - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 29 2013 @ 11:27 AM EDT
|
