decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Is that a US Federal thing? | 661 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Is that a US Federal thing?
Authored by: IANALitj on Sunday, March 31 2013 @ 01:52 PM EDT
The following is gross generalizations. "All generalizations have
exceptions, including this one."

Most of the law in the United States is state law, not Federal law. In many
respects, the state law is (mostly, but not entirely) based in turn on the
common law originally derived from England. One of the characteristics of
common law jurisprudence is that common law judges tend to pay attention to
common law decisions from other common law courts (although this is a matter of
accepting what they find persuasive, not of being bound by decisions
elsewhere).

The common law base in most states is heavily overlaid by extensive tinkering by
all the states' legislatures. (Some of this is not mere tinkering, but rather
innovation in over two hundred years since U.S. independence from Britain.)
Moreover, judges in the different states sometimes make different decisions.
This means that each of the fifty states (and several other non-state U.S.
jurisdictions) has laws -- and law -- that can differ from all the others.

U.S. Federal law covers a wide variety of important subjects, and can override
contrary state law. The U.S. constitution explicitly imposes some limits on
what the states can do and (by virtue of language in the 14th Amendment) now
implicitly imposes a great many more. There is a wikipedia article about this,
"Incorporation of the Bill of Rights."

Nevertheless, most law in the United States is at the state and local level.
Before the time when law was available online, a lawyer would (in my experience,
and always depending on the nature of the practice) most often need to consult
his or her state's statutes, that state's court decisions, and the U.S.
statutes. The need to consult the considerable body of federal court decisions
would arise less frequently.

The law of conversion is just one of innumerable examples. It dates back to the
common law, and applies (with local differences) almost entirely as a matter of
state law in the United States.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )