decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
I'll bet the lawyers had the initial demand letters typed & ready to go | 661 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
iMac
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, March 30 2013 @ 07:52 PM EDT
Announced in May 1998 and shipped in August, the iMac was Apple's computer for the new millennium. Aimed at the low-end consumer market and designed with the internet in mind, the iMac was positioned by Apple as the most original new computer since the original Mac in 1984, and came in a stylish new case design, with translucent "Bondi Blue" plastics. The iMac included a 4 Mbps IrDA port, and an internal 56Kpbs modem (a 33.6 kbps modem was originally announced in May, but was upped to 56 kbps at MacWorld.),
apple-history.com

The excitement of the internet. The simplicity of Macintosh. youtube.com

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I'll bet the lawyers had the initial demand letters typed & ready to go
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, March 30 2013 @ 09:23 PM EDT

But I have a nasty & suspicious mind.

Wayne
http://madhatter.ca

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Report: US Patent And Trademark Office Denies Apple’s iPad Mini Trademark Application, Deemed “M
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, March 31 2013 @ 10:18 AM EDT
Must have been the janitor or a security guard filling in
during the sequestration. I doubt that the real USPTO
examiners would have denied it. It is nice to see some good
come out of there, but in no way does it make up for all the
bad.

I thought that the "i" prefix was meant to be a narcissistic
thing, which just seems to me to be a very Apple-like trait.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Initial Denial Only -- which is very common
Authored by: Steve on Monday, April 01 2013 @ 11:56 AM EDT

The USPTO routinely issues a preliminary denial on trademarks. I've filed many applications for marks and this often happens. The process is detailed and the trademark office wants you (the applicant) to make a good case why your mark registration should be issued. You go back and forth with the examiner several times; at the end, either the examiner is happy with your submission or you're convinced the mark is not registrable.

The USPTO is not a court; one should not read ANYTHING into a preliminary rejection. The examiner will often suggest ways that the defective application can be repaired so the registration can be made.

To get a better understanding of initial rejections generally and this one in particular, read this article at macrumors.com.

And trademark examiners don't care what company comes before them or what else that company has done elsewhere. This initial rejection is standard practice; it's certainly not some sort of backlash against Apple for its behavior in the Samsung suit.

---
IAALBIANYL

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )