decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
80487SX | 661 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
80386 and friends
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, March 30 2013 @ 06:48 PM EDT
Dunno abt 80486SX but Moto did a 68040 and crippled 68LC040.
Models of the Macintosh Quadra family with a crippled chip
gained fpu function only via a 3rd party PCI card with the extra chip
graphics, nic, HD accelerator, etc.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

80487SX
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 01 2013 @ 03:00 AM EDT
Somewhere above, i've posted a more complete timeline.

To answer your question: basically no, the 80487SX is *not* a
FPU without a CPU.

The 80487SX is a very slightly modified 80486DX, but:

- more expensive than the original 80486DX: Intel felt that
because it's a FPU, it can sell it at higher price than a
CPU..

- A 80486SX/80487SX combi takes more motherboard space than a
80486DX

- In board with a combi of 80486SX and 80487SX, the 80486SX
is effectively disabled, and the 80487SX does 'the work', the
80486SX sleeps.

The 80487SX is more or less a scam ;-)

In the olden days, the C't (German) magazine had an article
describing how a 80486SX/80487SX motherboard was made to
'run' fully 80486DX-compatible with only the 80487SX
installed. The 80486SX was not installed, its function in the
combination was fulfilled by a number of connections and
resistors :-)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )