decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
U.S. NTSB reviewing whistleblower claims in 787 case [think burning batteries] | 136 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
U.S. NTSB reviewing whistleblower claims in 787 case [think burning batteries]
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, January 24 2013 @ 05:16 PM EST
Boeing entered a new risk area when they designed the 787 system
to take more out of the battery inflight than the onboard generator
could supply, to gain reduced fuel consumption. This requires high
charge rates from external supply while the plane is on the ground
causing elevated temperatures.
Designing into new risk areas is often interesting.

Airbus are also using LiIon batteries, but with a more conservative
power management scheme.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

U.S. NTSB reviewing whistleblower claims in 787 case [think burning batteries]
Authored by: albert on Friday, January 25 2013 @ 04:00 PM EST
New battery chemistries require fairly sophisticated load and charge monitoring.
Load monitoring is required so as not to exceed the battery rating for current
delivery, charge monitoring prevents over-charging. There are dedicated ICs
available to monitor these parameters, and others, such as temperature. These
tiny chips are often embedded in the battery pack. However, they only monitor
and report. Control of charging and load control must be done elsewhere. Even if
the charging systems are properly designed, nothing can be done to 'unshort' a
shorted battery.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )