Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

No | 138 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, January 23 2013 @ 02:23 PM EST

This appears to be an Ex Parte application for discovery in the US
to support Samsung's defense in Tokyo where Apple is suing
them for infringement of Japanese patents for funny bits of iPhone.
This has a separate case number and was discussed at
http://groklawstatic.ibiblio.org/articlebasic.php%3fstory=20121204024604685
Apple III?

What has already occurred in the other Apple v Samsung cases may
or not be affected by Judge Koh's Related Case Order 2178-20121203.
Samsung are looking for documents or pieces of hardware as evidence.
If they only wanted a witness they could chuck a sack over his head
and put him on a boat, standard CIA procedure.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Nope - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, January 24 2013 @ 10:31 AM EST

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )