decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Microsoft studies have helped Linux before | 138 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Microsoft studies have helped Linux before
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, January 23 2013 @ 10:14 PM EST
I remember reading (probably here on Groklaw), that Microsoft studies have
helped Linux before. Namely in the time that Linux was still upcoming in the
server marked, and Microsoft comparison studies helped Linux develloppers spot
an fix the bottlenecks in the area's they were behind on Windows Server.
So perhaps they just do not want to repeat the same mistake? ;)

BEcause if the study showed that only one program was the bottleneck for not
transferring half of those last 10% of PC/s then it could offer to splitthe
Windows licencing costs to devellop one, which could be higher then their normal
licencing income.
so
1/2 *1/2 * 10% * €7.000.000 = €175.000. Which is not bad for writing a one time
api that also allows compatinility for future plugins for Linux, Android and
webbased software.

MBB

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )