decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
unjust means and plea bargains | 559 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Unless it seeds reform it's a waste
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, January 16 2013 @ 09:45 AM EST
Genuine reform that is and not word play.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

unjust means and plea bargains
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, January 24 2013 @ 06:26 PM EST
What concerns me is the power given the federal prosecutor. How can it be
called justice when our federal gov seizes all the assets of a defendant (so
they can't be used in his defense) but proceeds to use the vast resources
provided by taxpayers to prosecute?? Perhaps back in Lincoln's day, lawyers
were roughly equal and had the same access to the available law books. But
today one prosecutor backed by legions of aids and all the money they want, can
run rings around a lone appointed lawyer who has multiple cases and is dealing
with hundreds of thousands of laws and prior cases. And yet the first things
the feds do is seize the defendants assets to prevent even that much of a
defense. Shouldn't there be laws that compel the defense to be on a par with the
prosecution, in resources, in time available, in assistance, in funding, and in
experience?

And then there is the travesty of "plea bargains". As it now stands,
when a prosecutor wants a feather in their cap and has caught at least one
person red-handed in a crime, they offer the GUILTY party a reduced sentence in
exchange for testimony against their target (for which they don't have any real
evidence, but they really want to add a "win" to advance their
career). What on earth does the guilty guy stand to loose for lying? on the
one hand, he knows he did it, he knows the evidence is there, and he knows the
sentence he ought to get. So when offered the chance to get off easy, what's
standing in his way? Because he's such a fine upstanding citizen that he would
never bring false testimony? This is the guy caught red-handed we're talking
about. Even if by some miracle, it eventually comes out that he lied, he can
lay it on the prosecution.

Plea bargains are nothing but a travesty of justice that serve to snare the
innocent in order to further someone's career.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )