decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
To take that a step further | 559 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
To take that a step further
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, January 18 2013 @ 10:14 AM EST

The US Attorney's Office quote for 35 years only lists 4 charges, not all the additional charges that were added on later:

AARON SWARTZ, 24, was charged in an indictment with wire fraud, computer fraud, unlawfully obtaining information from a protected computer, and recklessly damaging a protected computer. If convicted on these charges, SWARTZ faces up to 35 years in prison, to be followed by three years of supervised release, restitution, forfeiture and a fine of up to $1 million.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Another Ortiz quote
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, January 18 2013 @ 10:21 AM EST

United States Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz said, “Stealing is stealing whether you use a computer command or a crowbar, and whether you take documents, data or dollars. It is equally harmful to the victim whether you sell what you have stolen or give it away.”
Oritz: How about Sony's decision to steal functionality from the PS3 I Legally purchased?

If I didn't upgrade I was forced to have the blueray player become quickly outdated and eventually no longer function to play the new Blue Ray movies I purchased. I've got over 1,000 movies in my personal library, all bought and original dvd's and bluerays.

But choosing to upgrade I lost the functionality of installing Linux on it. That was the primary purpose I bought it for!

And I'm not the only victim of Sony's decision. There's many like me. I'd like to see the zeal you exercised in targeting a private individual accessing public domain documents to be targeted at a Corporation who is stealing from private individuals.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

    Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
    Comments are owned by the individual posters.

    PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )