decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Sony was not a problem | 559 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Sony was not a problem
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, January 17 2013 @ 05:50 PM EST
because most people don't know what a root kit is anyway.

(just ridiculing their reasoning)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Copyright maximalists
Authored by: Gringo_ on Friday, January 18 2013 @ 06:18 AM EST

Copyright maximalists is the term I have seen used, but "IP extremists" conveys the same idea. I have posted many times that they appear to control the Executive Branch (Obama's office), but rarely have seen anybody mention that or comment on it.

Glad to see at least one other person shares the same insight. It is the Executive Branch who was responsible for trying to force ACTA on the whole world, and now not satisfied with ACTA, they are the driving force behind "the Son of ACTA", the Trans-Pacific Partnership being negotiated on a fast track in secret again. The TPP threatens to displace the 1995 Trips agreement negotiated in the open under the World Trade Organization and promises even more draconian measures. Among them, incredibly, is a provision to increase the duration of copyrights by a further 20 years.

It is also the Executive Branch who ordered the DOJ and the FBI to serve the MAFIAA, and came up with this wonderful plan to take down websites on MAFIAA's target list like Mega and that hip-hop site before it.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )