decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Danger Will Robinson! | 559 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
MIT's Role as Described in Aaron Swartz's October Motion to Suppress ~pj Updated
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, January 17 2013 @ 12:23 PM EST
Yes, but remember, 99% of all contracts are fulfilled without a civil lawsuit.
The courts (civil and criminal) are there as a last resort to settle disputes.

Because--most of the people arraigned for crimes _are_ guilty, and everyone
recognizes there's no reason for doubt. The criminal courts are there when
either (1) the accused is so hard-core a criminal that his best bet is gambling
for a mistrial, or (2) the accused is actually innocent of this crime. (These
two situations can occur simultaneously, of course.)

Because of case (1), judges will almost invariably agree with the prosecution
that a convicted criminal should receive a steeper sentence than a confessed
criminal. If this were not so, every accused guilty party would gamble on a
mistrial because the bet would be free.

This is how the prosecutor's statement is so deceptive. The Red Queen could
simultaneously threaten this young man who had harmed no one with 35 years of
hard time (if he continued to assert his innocence) but publicly claim that out
of the generosity of her heart and the warmth of her human feelings she had so
generously, so sweetly, so considerately OFFERED only six months incarceration.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Danger Will Robinson!
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, January 17 2013 @ 02:39 PM EST
> John H. Langbein, Torture and Plea Bargaining

links to http://www.judicialstudies.unr.edu/JS_Summer09/JSP_Week_4/JS710Wk4.LangbeinToran dPleaBargtxt.pdf

First page reads
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.

Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=uclr.

Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.

JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
I hope you haven't unwittingly sent someone to the gallows...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )