decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
spines | 92 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
spines
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, January 16 2013 @ 09:16 AM EST
new insight on early spines at news.discovery.com

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

unprovable viewpoints taught as absolute truth
Authored by: Wol on Wednesday, January 16 2013 @ 03:51 PM EST
What then should we teach? :-)

Given that the ONLY thing that can be proven true is maths and, to quote
Einstein, "in as much as mathematics is certain it bears no relationship to
reality".

The problem is that the media has brainwashed itself into believing there is
such a thing as "truth". imho we need to teach classics and philosophy
- both subjects now despised by the modern media.

I've mentioned it before, but apparently a survey was done on "education in
classics" a year or so back. Given that the typical response rate to an
unsolicited random survey is lucky to reach 5%, what do you make of a survey
where OVER FIFTY PERCENT of solicited people responded to say "yes my
classics education made a very positive difference to my life".

As for philosophy, I used to think it was junk. I've changed my mind ...

But I'm rambling. At the end of the day, what education SHOULD do is give
children the opportunity to make their own minds up. What it typically does is
brainwash them ...

(Incidentally, I strongly suspect all this creationist stuff is a by-product of
the US's unofficial (because it's unconstitutional, but not for want of trying
by the ACLU) official atheism. I think we would have no problem at all teaching
creationism as part of R.E. or R.S. or whatever the subject is called, but I
suspect it just gets ignored.

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )