|
| Authored by: argee on Tuesday, January 15 2013 @ 11:45 PM EST |
"Ortiz herself has thus far declined to comment out of
respect for the privacy of the Swartz family." --Huffington
Post.
Yeah, right.
---
--
argee[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: PJ on Tuesday, January 15 2013 @ 11:51 PM EST |
If so, then the decision wouldn't have
been Ms. Ortiz's.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: hardmath on Wednesday, January 16 2013 @ 12:22 AM EST |
My bad.
---
Recursion is the opprobrium of the mathists. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, January 16 2013 @ 06:07 AM EST |
The petition on the whitehouse.gov site hit 25,000 signees. Hopefully the
Administration will consider the message it delivers carefully.
As an aside, one news organization speculated that Ortiz had been
considering a run for Governor, and that this case had killed her chances.
While she wasn't directly responsible, her employee was.
The buck stops on her desk.
Wayne
http://madhatter.ca
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: DannyB on Wednesday, January 16 2013 @ 01:02 PM EST |
Although his indictment on 13 felony counts was announced by U.S.
Atty. Carmen M. Ortiz in Massachusetts, accounts from Swartz’s supporters say
much of the behind- the-scenes negotiations were handled by Assistant U.S. Atty.
Stephen P. Heymann.
There's a
petition for that
too.
---
The price of freedom is
eternal litigation. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
