decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Apple Sued in Germany, if only they would also act against Sony | 92 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Apple Sued in Germany, if only they would also act against Sony
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, January 15 2013 @ 08:05 PM EST
1. Europe isn't taking any stance in this case. It is a Belgian consumer organization (not German).

2. There are plenty of stores selling Apple products, in which case Apple is not the seller. And Apple sells many products made by other companies in its stores and on its website, in which case Apple is the seller.

3. If you buy an Apple product, you get a product made by a large and well- known company. But if you go into any department store, you'll find thousands and thousands of products made by companies that you don't know, that you have never heard of, that you wouldn't know how to contact, where you don't know what reputation they have, where you cannot know whether the company still exists when you want them to fix a problem, and the company may be located far away from where you are which makes it very hard to take them to court if you have to. For that reason, it makes a lot more sense if the store is responsible for the product quality. Especially since the sales contract is between you and the store, not between you and the manufacturer.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )