decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
I still think Gates is key | 199 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I still think Gates is key
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, January 16 2013 @ 09:01 AM EST

Gates + Ballmer does not equate to controlling shares in Microsoft.

But Gates is still incredibly influential. Is he influential enough that the rest of the BOD will listen to him still?

I think he is.

Gates and Ballmer have been in this together since almost the beginning. Two of the infamous original three. If I remember correctly, Gates sold Allen on bringing Ballmer on board for the Business side. Additionally, taking Allen's memoirs at face value, Gates then discussed with Ballmer a situation to out Allen.

One of two things has to happen before Ballmer is removed:

    A: The 7 other individuals of the 9 BOD decides Gates no longer has the influence and they will decide against Gates recommendations. This assumes they have sufficient control over voting they can all vote against Gates and succeed.
    B: Gates finally decides to get rid of Ballmer.
My humble opinion based on the above:

If Gates decides to get rid of Ballmer, he's gone regardless of whether anyone - including Gartner - thinks Ballmer is best for the leadership.

If Gates decides to keep Ballmer, and the rest of the BOD is "controlled" by Gates, then nothing anyone - including Gartner - says will oust Ballmer.

You want Ballmer gone from the leadership of Microsoft? You have to get rid of Gates or convince Gates to get rid of Ballmer. Good luck on either of those two.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )