decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
E-Filing and the Explosion in Tax-Return Fraud | 199 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
E-Filing and the Explosion in Tax-Return Fraud
Authored by: tknarr on Tuesday, January 15 2013 @ 01:43 PM EST

Bear in mind that the fraudsters won't file a real return using your information. They'll file a return using fake information showing a large refund, eg. by using a larger number of dependents, tax credits and so on, betting that the refund'll hit their bank account before the IRS gets around to investigating the return. You then become the easy target for the IRS when you file what they see as the second return conflicting with the first one. You'll have to fight to prove both that a) you're the real taxpayer and the second return is legitimate and b) you aren't the person who filed the first fraudulent return trying to cover their tracks. How hard that'll be depends basically on which IRS agent you get and how bad a week they're having.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Eh, careful.
Authored by: OpenSourceFTW on Tuesday, January 15 2013 @ 02:32 PM EST
I heard the IRS does not like it when you end up with a balance due several
years in a row. Might make you pay estimated taxes (I forget exactly what).

All I know is that the IRS would rather cut you a refund check (and get 100%
payment) then have you owe and possibly not be able to pay. Sad, but true.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )