Authored by: IANALitj on Monday, January 07 2013 @ 02:10 AM EST |
Second sentence of the second paragraph. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: IANALitj on Monday, January 07 2013 @ 02:14 AM EST |
It's the label on a link in the first sentence of the ninth paragraph (counting
indented quotations as being paragraphs).[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, January 07 2013 @ 04:09 AM EST |
persuasive adn intriguing > persuasive and intriguing [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, January 07 2013 @ 07:29 AM EST |
Third paragraph of the post:
denied summary judment with respect
to
denied summary judgement with respect to
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, January 07 2013 @ 07:42 AM EST |
The motion to dismiss was filed pursuant to Court of Chancery Rule 12(b)(6),
which is "failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted",
which was mostly likely raised in a motion to dismiss on the pleadings (see
Court of Chancery Rule 12(c), not a motion for summary judgment. See
http://courts.delaware.gov/rules/ChanceryRules2008.pdf[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: feldegast on Monday, January 07 2013 @ 08:20 AM EST |
No text
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2013 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, January 07 2013 @ 08:54 AM EST |
Footnote 129 [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: AntiFUD on Monday, January 07 2013 @ 08:17 PM EST |
Whilst the Judge's ruling's Footnote 182 correctly goes to the right footnote
(and returns correctly) the listing of footnotes runs ... 181, 82, 183 ... but
the underlying html tag correctly reflects 182.
The only reason I mention it is because it would be more correcter for the
version that goes to the LOC archive.
---
IANAL - Free to Fight FUD - "to this very day"
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|