decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
You need to try harder | 191 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
OpenShift Origin
Authored by: PJ on Monday, January 07 2013 @ 04:04 PM EST
Here's what a programmer friend told me about it:
If the so-called "cloud" is the next thing, OpenShift is to the cloud what GNU was to operating systems.

Free software web applications created by independent programmers run unmodified on OS, on a free service and no proprietary API unlike other popular offerings like Amazon (and uh... Azure). Java, Ruby, Python, PostgresSQL, MongoDB, MySql, all free software, on a free service for starters.

Sun aimed at something like this years ago but it was too little too late, internal disputes compromised the vision, and then it got lost in the dense fog of Oracle bureaucracy.

Great to see Red Hat delivering on its Free Software DNA.

The Register has an article at http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/27/redhat_openshift_enterprise_paas/

It contains some inaccuracies, for example when they say OpenShift supports "Ruby 3" ---they actually mean Ruby on Rails 3, which is a web development framework powered by the Ruby programming language, OpenShift does support Ruby 1.8 and Ruby 1.9 flavours (the latest stable releases) among other languages and base software you can install.

If you don't understand it, don't worry. It's not really for your needs. But Groklaw has a lot of developers as members, and they might be interested in something like this.

Think of it like a patent article on injunctions post-Ebay or something even more abstruse, like a red-lined version of AIA. You might immediately understand it, and know what to do with it in the real world, but nonlawyers might not understand it even if they read it, without explanation.

But that is what Groklaw is for, and I'm sure others will explain to you more about it.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

You need to try harder
Authored by: jbb on Monday, January 07 2013 @ 09:12 PM EST
I followed your Redhat wiki link and it immediately led to a FAQ that answers some of your questions. It also led to Introduction to Cartridge Building:
Before we get too far into the low level features of a cartridge, it's important to understand some terms.
  • Cartridge: Configuration templates, scripts, deps required to add a feature to OpenShift.
  • Cartridge instantiation: The result of a cartridge feature addition.
  • Gear: A container on a host that houses one or more cartridges. Consists of some resources like cpu, disk, etc and a unix user.
  • StickShift-node: A set of utilities used
  • Node: A host (for example, a virtual machine) where OpenShift origin apps live.
I'm not claiming that this brief list makes all things clear. My point is that the information you are asking for is available to those who are willing to scratch the surface.

We need context to create meaning. This is why it can be difficult for people to create documentation for their own projects. They are immersed in the context that needs to be conveyed to the readers. Likewise, it is easier for someone who is already familiar with the genre of technology to understand the early documentation created for a new project.

People who have a high tolerance for reading things they don't yet full grasp have a much easier time of picking this stuff up. It is the same skill that is needed to work through physics and math text books.

---
Our job is to remind ourselves that there are more contexts
than the one we’re in now — the one that we think is reality.
-- Alan Kay

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

OpenShift Origin
Authored by: matth on Tuesday, January 08 2013 @ 09:15 AM EST

I would not compare the jargon specific to one product (even a big one such as the Java language) to the somewhat rigorous legal jargon that is shared by students, professors, judges, and practicing attorneys. When we (software developers) invent new terminology, it serves multiple purposes: Software metaphors may convey intention, attitude, refer to other metaphors or trade disciplines, etc. OpenShift employs a product jargon that seems to me familiar in style and structure to many projects, so it is a common vernacular in a sense, but this particular instance belongs to a product.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )