|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, January 08 2013 @ 01:38 PM EST |
The likelihood of a ... traffic court judge arrogating the right to overturn a
century of supreme court judgments ... is rather low.
But it should be apparent that papers do not constitute occupancy....
"Hello...Mariott Hotel"
"This is Mr. Smith....I just got a bill for 31 days occupancy"
"Yes?"
"I stayed there one night last month!"
"Ah, but you left your ID card on the nightstand. We'll be billing you for
single-occupancy rates until you return and pick it up."
Sounds pretty stupid, even applied to a real person. And it's unlikely to be
persuasive when argued of an incorporated entity such as a church, hospital,
school, tradesmen's guild .... or, for that matter, an entity incorporated for
commercial purposes.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: hardmath on Tuesday, January 08 2013 @ 07:01 PM EST |
A Firesign Theater reference!!!
You never know what you will read on Groklaw!!!
---
Recursion is the opprobrium of the mathists. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|