Is it fair to implement a patented technology like this, refuse to license it, perform analysis of actual use patterns of your customers, and then make the courts force you to pay only the part the patent holder can prove took advantage of the functionality? Essentially reversing the process - using the courts to enact a pay-only-what-your-customers-use policy as opposed to negotiating at the start.

---
IANAL

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

• Using the courts to implement a pay-only-what-your-customers-use policy - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, January 10 2013 @ 06:21 AM EST