decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Streams | 429 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Streams
Authored by: Ian Al on Monday, January 14 2013 @ 11:58 AM EST
We have the idea of streams of digital values flowing down the wires of
computers, in our heads. It's true for long lines like telephone and telegraph,
but wrong for a computer.

In the computer and the associated short cables like SATA, PATA, USB and HDMI
there are no streams of ones and noughts.

For the computer motherboard and the cables to peripherals there is a minuscule
delay while the electrical charge at the output of a logical gate appears at the
input of the next logical gate due to the capacitance and inductance of the
connecting circuit (electrical driver to driver, for cable connections).
However, the computer and cables are clocked such that the delay is
insignificant compared to the signal timing.

The speed of the motherboard circuitry is low enough that the motherboard wiring
busses present the memory charge signs to the processor effectively the moment
they are logically clocked to the output port of the memory and vice verse.

Physics tells us there is a delay, but the motherboard works slowly enough that
the delay is of no consequence. This is also true for parallel and 'serial'
connections between motherboard and hard drive.

Software is written text that will, after processing, generate the electrical
charge signs in the motherboard components and in the hard drive.

There are only charge signs in a computer. Even when a software writer 'writes'
software on a computer, the typed characters are immediately converted to sets
of charge signs.

The typed characters could never get to the memory, unless the keyboard
converted them into charge sign sets ('keycodes', although the system may
translate the actual sign sets from the keyboard electronics into standard
system values). We see documents presented to us as glyphs on the screen and we
see signs in the computer presented as hexadecimal values represented by glyphs,
but this is not what is inside of the computer, it is merely a representation.

The source code (as a bunch of charge signs) is compiled (manipulated by the
processor) into another bunch of charge signs that can be clocked from memory to
the processor data port logical circuitry instantaneously, but in the correct
sequence, for 'execution'.

So, software is not interpreted into streams of ones and noughts. The keyboard
converts every key depressed, immediately, into a charge sign set. It's just
that some files of charge sign sets can be manipulated (compiled) into
'executable' charge sign sets (aka, binary files).

---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )