decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more... 		decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

Donate Paypal

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Gleick | 429 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Gleick
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, January 11 2013 @ 11:07 PM EST
That isn't the full truth PJ. Mixed in with the actual board minutes he obtained
by impersonating a board member was a fake document. Gleick admits that this
fake document was not sent to him with the others. He claims he was sent it
anonymously, something which few people believe.

The valid board documents are all pretty ordinary and boring board type
documents. The fake document was the one with all the exciting widely reported
sound bites in it. It is the writing style of this fake document (described as
reading like something "written from the secret villain lair in a Batman
comic") that first pointed the finger at Gleick. Among other things it
portrays Gleick as a major nemesis of the Heartland institute.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Gleick - Authored by: PJ on Friday, January 11 2013 @ 11:23 PM EST
    • Gleick - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, January 11 2013 @ 11:25 PM EST
      • Gleick - Authored by: PJ on Saturday, January 12 2013 @ 12:09 AM EST
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details ) 		Site layout based on Woodlands theme by Bryan Bell.
Groklaw logo by John Crowley.
News Picks logo by Ted Thompson.
Powered By GeekLog
Created this page in 0.03 seconds