decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
So you are saying that this sort of stuff wasn't rife | 130 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
So you are saying that this sort of stuff wasn't rife
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, January 06 2013 @ 04:59 AM EST
>I have complete sympathy for the people who got taken in (I can totally see
how easy it would be to fall for it), but in the end, they were unwise.

They might have been unwise, but for those who want to live the American dream,
of working hard, and owning your own home, it seemed as if their dream was about
to come true. And for some of them it did.

One factor that most people ignore, is that the monthly mortgage payment was, at
least initially, substantially less than the rent that the person was paying.
Would you rather pay US$400 a month mortgage, or US$800 a month to rent an
apartment? Four years down the road is long time to consider, and who knows what
rents might go up. In the meantime, one might be able to hang onto the house
one purchased.

Lose a job, and things get very rough, very fast.
The adjustable part of the mortgage goes up, and things get very rough, very
fast.

What happened in the sub-prime market, was that people lost jobs in droves,
whilst interest rates went up. The low-level of born to be foreclosed upon
mortgages suddenly sky-rocketed.

>In the end, the mortgage companies were also foolish, because they got hurt
badly in the end.

They were taking advantage of laws that enabled them to generate more revenue,
in the short term, by being financially irresponsible, than by being fiscally
prudent.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )