decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
More patents = more revenue | 364 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
More patents = more revenue
Authored by: RPN on Friday, January 04 2013 @ 02:45 PM EST
I can remember a long time ago when the USPTO was shifted away from government
funding towards paying its own way I and many others saw this as a real problem
in this specific field. That's not to say moving some things to 'arm's length'
from government is a bad thing because it definitely isn't. This just was
clearly a case of the 'wrong incentive' coming into play for this particular
task/function.

Everything that has happened since only reinforces the view I had then and I do
think you are right. This is driven far to much by the desire to gain revenue.
Far to little by doing the job right for the national/social good. There is no
consideration of the consequences and no impact of them on the USPTO really. But
the costs are huge in additional litigation costs for businesses and therefore
extra cost to us their consumers. This is perhaps something that needs to be
researched and used as an argument more. I don't know what the full cost of
software patents is but I would guess above $10 billion a year in the US just in
litigation costs, that's around $30 dollars on average per citizen in product
prices inflated by that cost. Or you can see it as $10 billion not invested in
R&D to keep the US competitive in the industry. Etc.

Richard.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

up to a point
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, January 08 2013 @ 06:20 AM EST
Then everyone stops making stuff cause your asking for cash
they dont want to pay and then you get zero or less.
You have years to continue squeezing and people like
myself just move on to other stuff or we create locally and
never distribute and violate all your laws and rules and don't care. Then you
have your justice system get pounded
wiht lawsuits, jail times and screwed lives caus eyou had an
idea years back and i saw a newer way to use it that is now
useful...

Well your just trying to control me and im not biting.


[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )