decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
How about two formats? | 364 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Must use MS formats?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, January 04 2013 @ 06:43 AM EST
Does this translation come close to working right now? About 3 years ago, I
tried to deal with Power Point presentations using Open Office, but I had a lot
of trouble doing this. Has it been improved that much? I can readily accept
that translating into older Word formats has been pretty much perfected by now.

By the way, thanks for fixing my double comment that was posted at 4:56 EST. I
don't know what was going on then, but the website didn't seem to be responding,
so I re-sent, not knowing that the first had gone through.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

How about two formats?
Authored by: ailuromancy on Saturday, January 05 2013 @ 12:26 AM EST

Send files in Microsoft format as required, but add a copy in an open format so they have something that actually works. I have witnessed plenty of shouting and swearing caused by people being unable to use Microsoft format documents with Microsoft software. All that swearing should attract the attention of someone kind enough to demonstrate Libre Office. Next time the USPTO asks for consultation documents, there will be a typo - Microsoft will accidently be spelled Libre.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Must use MS formats?
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, January 05 2013 @ 11:55 AM EST
Of course people who use LaTeX with the Beamer class to make presentations can't
easily do that. PDFs should be accepted too.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Must use MS formats?
Authored by: Tyro on Saturday, January 05 2013 @ 10:40 PM EST
It could be ignorance, but I'm cynical enough to believe that they don't want to
hear from anyone who might object to software patents. So this is just intended
as another stumbling block, albeit a minor one.

And it's my suspicion that any submissions that object to software patents will
effectively end up in the trash no matter what form they are submitted in. They
have proven over and over that they prefer to issue patents, even obviously
invalid patents. Even blatantly obviously invalid patents. I think one of the
most blatant was a patent on adding together two numbers in Basic. This years
after Basic was first used at Dartmouth. (Perhaps it was only in Microsoft
Basic...I'm relying on second hand reports as I won't read patents. The actual
report I saw said the patent was on adding 1 and 1 to get two in Microsoft
Basic, but I find that hard to believe.)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )