decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
``means-plus-function'' | 364 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I'm confused.
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, January 04 2013 @ 04:48 AM EST
If the roundtables are being held in the month of February, how can anything
have a submission date deadline of March 15th to be considered? I think there
must be a date mixup, or the deadline must be for something submitted after the
fact, maybe for the USPTO to take into consideration in making decisions
afterwards?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • I'm confused. - Authored by: PJ on Friday, January 04 2013 @ 05:23 AM EST
    • I'm confused. - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, January 05 2013 @ 07:38 AM EST
      • I'm confused. - Authored by: PJ on Saturday, January 05 2013 @ 11:47 AM EST
Corrections here
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, January 04 2013 @ 06:44 AM EST
"Lordy, I'd like to give a presentation about the annoyance
the USPTO creates by pushing propriatary"

propriatary -> proprietary

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

propriatary -> proprietary
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, January 04 2013 @ 12:39 PM EST
n/t

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

partership
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, January 04 2013 @ 04:28 PM EST
s/partership/partnership/

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

``means-plus-function''
Authored by: Imaginos1892 on Friday, January 04 2013 @ 05:25 PM EST
Opening double-quote was converted to two backticks
------------------
Relax, Charlie; I've got an ANgle!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )