decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Who Is Too Unbalanced to Be Armed? | 337 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Ownership of personal nuclear weapons
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 10:36 PM EST
I see little choice when one has to face up to a government regime which can
leave you as a slightly greasy spot on the melted sand.

Maybe start a neighborhood cold war standoff with the government.

Support the National Newklar Association.


[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Who Is Too Unbalanced to Be Armed?
Authored by: PJ on Friday, December 28 2012 @ 12:55 AM EST
No logical reasons for the average person not
to have nuclear weapons???!! Are you nuts?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Welcome to the US - the part of the globe that glows in the dark.
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 28 2012 @ 01:58 AM EST
Glad I don't live there any more.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Darwin Award Candidates
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 28 2012 @ 12:05 PM EST

Nice - no logical reason. How about just the basics that someone unfamiliar with the proper handling will end up doing something to set it off inadvertantly in a well populated area?

Vehicles have a certain level of danger when not handled properly. I'd like to think that's a very valid reason why there are driving schools and you need to pass certain tests in order to acquire a driver's license.

Can you imagine the knowledge and testing one would have to go through in order to qualify for the safe handling of a nuclear device let alone the ownership of one?

How's that for a sound logical reason:

    Lack of proper knowledge from which to properly assemble, store, disassemble a nuclear device weighed against the risk factor of how much damage it could cause if it went off accidently!
Of course "accidental" isn't quite the right word when an explosive of any charge is mis-handled and goes off.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )