Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Judge William Alsup v Judge Lucy Koh - Day v Night - Efficiency v Confusion - Order v Chaos. | 337 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Judge William Alsup v Judge Lucy Koh - Day v Night - Efficiency v Confusion - Order v Chaos.

Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 28 2012 @ 12:43 PM EST

From what I know, it seems at best premature to say Apple has won almost
entirely or to even praise Apple's tactics. No permanent injunction for Apple
so far, and the two preliminary injunctions Apple briefly did have were reversed
or vacated. It also looks like Judge Koh is going to throw out at least one of
the utility patents (which may require a retrial on some or maybe even a lot of
issues) and is going to at least reduce damages in other areas. Plus, as others
have said, there is the incalculable damage Apple has inflicted on itself with
its troll-like behavior. But whatever the ultimate outcome in the lawsuit, it
won't be based on the "just let me help you out judge" ingratiating
behavior Apple seems to have been laying on so thick with the judge in this
transcript.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )