decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Wow! This is some turtured sentence construction! | 483 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Wow! This is some turtured sentence construction!
Authored by: Charles888 on Monday, December 24 2012 @ 10:04 AM EST
In your analogy, "dead deer" can in no way be related to
"the people". In the 2nd, a well regulated militia ARE part
of the People. The REASON for "the right of the people to
keep and bear arms" is because "A well regulated militia,
being necessary to the security of a free state", but the
well regulated militia is part of the people getting that
right (or putting a limit on government power like you
argued before - effectively the same thing).

As to your argument about "well-regulated" being hyphenated.
I don't know where you get that myth (it is not the first
time I hear it, so it must be some gun right campaign red
herring). It makes no difference, but more importantly,
there is no such thing in the text of the amendment, they
are TWO WORDS (whether you read the official transcript or
go to the original document):
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_tra
nscript.html

One last thing: a militia is not just an armed populace. In
the context of the time, these states were a lot more
independent than they are today after multiple amendments.
They were trying to protect their means to field a military
force. A militia, in the vernacular of the time, were the
states military, as opposed to the Continental Army (the
federal military) which became a few years later the US
Army.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )