decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more... 		decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

Donate Paypal

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
This year, I don't know anyone wants iphone | 483 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Corrections Thread Here...
Authored by: lnuss on Thursday, December 20 2012 @ 07:11 PM EST
...

---
Larry N.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Off Topic Thread Here...
Authored by: lnuss on Thursday, December 20 2012 @ 07:12 PM EST
...

---
Larry N.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Newspicks Thread Here...
Authored by: lnuss on Thursday, December 20 2012 @ 07:13 PM EST
...

---
Larry N.

[ Reply to This | # ]

COMES Thread Here...
Authored by: lnuss on Thursday, December 20 2012 @ 07:14 PM EST
...

---
Larry N.

[ Reply to This | # ]

seriously apple
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 20 2012 @ 07:19 PM EST
Enough is enough you are not gonna get a sales ban, your patents are starting to
see what they really are, bogus and invalid. Save what little face you have
left.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Vote for Groklaw Thread LAST CHANCE!
Authored by: OpenSourceFTW on Friday, December 21 2012 @ 01:26 AM EST
Voting ends on the 21st, along with the world. :P

Vote now!: http://www.abajournal.com/blawg100 (Legal Technology Category)

---
I voted for Groklaw (Legal Technology Category) in the 2012 ABA Journal Blawg 100. Did you? http://www.abajournal.com/blawg100. Voting ends Dec 21.

[ Reply to This | # ]

  • I voted! - Authored by: artp on Friday, December 21 2012 @ 01:23 PM EST
So who gets to appeal?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 21 2012 @ 10:47 AM EST
Presumably Samsung will want to appeal against the decision itself - what with it being the clear result of jury misconduct and finding them guilty of infringing patents that have since turned out to be utterly invalid and worthless all along. Will Samsung and Apple both appeal? Who will be heard (first or at all)? What's the process for a situation like this where both sides have serious issues with the outcome of the case?

[ Reply to This | # ]

Transcriptions PDF to text
Authored by: The Cornishman on Friday, December 21 2012 @ 01:58 PM EST
PJ wrote:
If you would like to help with that, feel free to leave a comment as to which one you will work on. I'm almost done with day 6, so pick another one, please.

I've picked up day 8, for no very good reason :) and it's pretty easy, with pdf2txt and some sed to come up with a straight text version of the PDF, without the line numbers. It's plug-ugly, though, all in CAPS and no line longer than 64 characters.

PJ: do you want the raw text? Shall I additionally, or as an alternative, try to make it more like the transcripts you've already shared with us?

Jonathan

---
(c) assigned to PJ

[ Reply to This | # ]

This year, I don't know anyone wants iphone
Authored by: kawabago on Friday, December 21 2012 @ 08:05 PM EST
This year I don't know anyone who wants an iPhone. People are
starting to see Apple for what it is, a greedy abusive
corporation. That is sentiment Samsung and Google couldn't
buy, Apple had to give it to them on a platter.

[ Reply to This | # ]

A permanent ban based on preliminary invalidated patents?
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, December 22 2012 @ 04:09 AM EST
If Apple does not want to have their whole case go up in flames in the Federal
Circuit, they should try focusing on those aspects of the case where they have
an actual chance on appeal.

While the Federal Circuit is known to favor patent holders even in flat defiance
of Supreme Court rulings, I would still suppose that there are limits to how far
they are willing to be considered the laughing stock of the legal profession.

[ Reply to This | # ]
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details ) 		Site layout based on Woodlands theme by Bryan Bell.
Groklaw logo by John Crowley.
News Picks logo by Ted Thompson.
Powered By GeekLog
Created this page in 0.05 seconds