Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Not quite ... | 483 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Not quite ...

Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 21 2012 @ 08:00 AM EST

M$ seems to try to creat a legal offence such that the other
side will want to settle, i.e. M$ extorts money from smaller
fish.

On the other hand is Apple who seems to pick on any fish
regardless of size or type because they don't want them to
produce a better product even if they can.

But, their end goal is the same - eliminate the competition
such that they, either A$ or M$, don't have to try and work
to produce better products such that customers will actually
be free to choose for that reason.

Both A$ and M$ have become both corporate losers and
corporate abusers in the world of computer tech. Since
M$ has always been that way, I guess you are right in that
A$ is jealous of M$ and is trying to follow M$'s path to
irrelevence, and, I sincerely hope for both, on to chapters
11 then 7.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )